Overblog
Follow this blog Administration + Create my blog
March 28 2021 7 28 /03 /March /2021 20:20

 It's hard to take the possibility of a 32-county state seriously when the Irish Republic don't take it seriously. None of them seem intent on competing in Northern Irish constituencies in a united state. As a consequence, we may well have nine or ten different political parties represented in a future Dail, with fifteen or twenty seats each. This would be a recipe for chaos, or at best parliamentary gridlock. The only beneficiaries of unity would be Sinn Fein who would double their Dail representation.

That's the first complexity and obstacle for unity.


Secondly, those who voted against Brexit did so on the basis that leaving the EU would leave us economically worse off. Surely, this argument holds true for Irish unity.

It's not easy to predict the economic outcome of Irish unity, but one could hazard a guess that unification will leave both sides of the border worse off. If anyone thinks that John Bull is going to write a big blank cheque as a leaving present, they are seriously deluded.

When push comes to shove, how keen would the good folk in the Irish Republic be when they have to fund the benefits of welfare recipients in the northern counties? Surely an increase in taxation would be required? How will they feel when investment in their business parks, industrial estates, and public transport is shunted down the queue by reallocation of funds to Carrickfergus or Ballymena or Limavady?

I'm not hostile to the concept of a united Ireland. However, rejoining the EU isn't an attractive thought. A state that takes four months to elect its prime minister after an election isn't exactly an enticing prospect either.
The only real winners would be the Shinners. 
 
Irish republicanism is a fine ideal. What ruins it for me is Irish republicans.
Share this post
Repost0
November 27 2020 5 27 /11 /November /2020 17:53

I realised several years ago that I am a little like Charlie George, the Arsenic legend (or Chelsea's Alan Hudson).

 Tis all the more surprising, since I dinnae support Arsenil. Our Charlie was one of the most talented players of his generation. If he had been Dutch, he would more than possibly have fitted into their total football outfit of the 1970s. Instead, it was Charlie's misfortune that the pragmatic Alf Ramsey didn't have any time for this maverick. Alf preferred less gifted players who were a safe pair of hands. This partially explains why Blighty went into decline on the international stage after the heights of 1966.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, I too am a maverick (or square peg). I am really talented (or so I have been told), but I am not someone that many small minds in HR departments would entertain. The Northern Irish business community doesn't really possess too many real entrepreneurs. This is why the employers in Ulster and me wouldn't really be on the same page. I'm actually more of a risk-taker than most of them.

This is why I will probably never be welcomed into the bosom of any employer any time soon. Like Charlie or Alan, I'm just a little too awkward for folk who demand 'compliance'. (As Chrissie Hynde sang in 'Talk Of The Town' "It's hard to live by the rules. I never could and still never do." πŸ˜…)

 I'm a creative soul and I like to think outside of the box. Such attributes are anathema for many employers. It has been suggested that I apply for work with the civil service, or apply for this, or apply for that. Most of these jobs require folk to execute someone else's wishes. It's not really my domain. I might as well apply for the role of a circus acrobat than apply for any such lousy roles in bureaucracy.

Well, I have finally hit upon my true vocation over two months ago, and I am now engaged in the rather tiresome process of trying to persuade the powers that be to create a role for me, since this society appears to have no relevant role pour moi. I'm having to lobby politicians and civil servants (yuk!), but I am an old hand at trying to engage politicos. I am a wordsmith, so I do write with authority. When an elected representative gets an email from me, it's like receiving a message from their old headmaster.πŸ˜…

Anyway, I will fight tooth and claw to get this role created. I have belatedly found my 'mission'.
In the meantime, I'm still in Charlie George (or Alan Hudson) territory.

Alan Hudson only won two England caps, while Charlie only ended up playing once for England, which was bizarre, and even then he got hauled off after about an hour in a friendly match against the Republic of Ireland. I can definitely relate to that!

Share this post
Repost0
November 26 2020 4 26 /11 /November /2020 22:18

I'm a bit reluctant to tell this tale. I'm not sure that it puts me in a good light, but it is what it is. Besides, it's just over ten years ago, and I have made a lot of strides recently and am actually in a better frame of mind nowadays. 

I used to work for a Belfast taxi firm. I went through a busy phase of a couple of years from 2007 to 2009 where I wrote about a dozen non-fiction reference books in my spare time, while also working long hours for a taxi firm. By 2009, I was getting miffed about being passed over for promotion at work. I believe the fact that I dared to hold a few opinions counted against me. In fact, one of my bosses bought one of my books and when he read the inner workings of my mind, he was a bit concerned about promoting me, or so I was told. 

Eventually by the early summer of 2009, I had decided to jump ship in August, and planned to go out with a bang. Yes that's right: I was feeling vindictive (not for the first time or the last.....) 

I did have a slightly privileged position at work of booking taxis for special customers, such as BBC staff and assorted celebrities and elected politicians. I started making note of a lot of names and compiling email addresses of about three hundred people who had booked taxis on the BBC account, as well as various MLAs too. 

The political background to my er crusade was the expenses scandal. The BBC, amongst others, was highlighting the abuse of expenses, yet in all the major cities of the UK where the BBC had premises, they were booking shed loads of taxis each day for staff and guests. These taxis were a free ride for the passengers, because the BBC (or to be exact, the licence feepayer) was paying for all these journeys. Some MLAs were getting taxis paid for out of the public purse. William Hay, who was the Speaker in the Stormont Assembly, was getting free executive taxi rides from Londonderry to Belfast, costing the taxpayer ninety pounds per journey. I kid you not. There were loads of other examples of this nature in Belfast, and probably far more across the Irish Sea. 

Radio Ulster used to have a daily slot on TalkBack where a sage was invited to give a monologue on a topical issue. Often their food for thought items were excellent. However, I discovered that they were getting free rides (at the feepayer's expense) to be recorded in Belfast. This involved taxis to and fro Bangor and somewhere out in the sticks. This was another costly BBC measure that was coming out of their funds (and who funds them?). I think that they knocked this on the head possibly as a result of my whistleblowing. I've never heard any food for thought monologues since on TalkBack.

I dressed my motives up as a personal crusade which was in the public interest. It was. However, my motives were varied! I correctly guessed that the press might be interested in a bit of whistleblowing from GW. Lo and behold, the good old News Of The World got in touch and I arranged to meet their Belfast journo, Ciaran, in a coffee shop way up the top of the Lisburn Road. 

I passed on lots of info to Ciaran on a Thursday evening, demanded £1,000 for my efforts, and unknown to him, I emailed hundreds of BBC staff, scoffing at their free rides and their hypocrisy. I used my Michael Corleone quote on them: "We're both part of the same hypocrisy!" 

My emails spooked some of them big time, because I worded them that I was passing the information on to "other organisations". I meant to newspapers. A few of them misinterpreted it as the paramilitaries. The BBC and the media are bullies. They like to highlight the flaws in others, to scrutinise, but when you confront them, they don't like it.

Someone from the BBC emailed me on the Saturday. I think that it was someone in HR who was stating that I was breaking the law. It was Saturday afternoon and I couldn't get to solicitors then. The following day, I walked down to the Tesco's on the Dublin Road and was actually relieved that the story wasn't on the front of the News Of The World! It wasn't anywhere that I could see. Nevertheless, I feared that I might get a visit from the law, so I kept my curtains shut all Sunday! 

Then early on Tuesday morning, I got a call from an English geezer from the BBC who said that I was in hot water and offered to meet me. I was tempted to hang up. I think that he said later that if I had hung up, I'd have got arrested. Anyway, I arranged to meet him and a colleague in Clements Coffee Shop, across from Belfast Central Library. I think that they might have gone through a library computer the evening before to trace my emails. 

His name was Tony. I forget his full name. He gave me his card. I'm not sure where it is now. He and his colleague had been flown in from the north of England by the BBC especially to interview me! They were ex-policemen, now employed by the BBC as investigators. In fact, Tony was previously a hostage negotiator. He was quite a jovial chap and when he discovered that I wasn't passing on BBC staff details to paramilitaries, he said I was "a pillock"! The conversation was quite cordial and they weren't going to press charges. They were confident that the NOTW wouldn't publish anything. 

I kind of cost my mate Tommy Dangerous his job, but when Tommy Dangerous was applying for another job, I acted as his employment referee and gave him a glowing reference which got him a new job! 

Well the News Of The World did eventually publish something a couple of weeks later, but it was a minor story on page nine or ten. It wasn't a screaming front page headline, which I initially wanted and then feared! I had signed a contract with the NOTW and while I expressed my concern that I was flirting with illegality, Ciaran just gave me the half-baked assurance that I was acting in the public interest. I kept the contract hidden under the mat in me car, in case the police came-a -calling. 

Of course, the NOTW downplayed my efforts and only promised me a measly £150. I didn't have much choice in the matter! I couldn't exactly complain to the police. It took me until January 2010 before I prompted Ciaran to meet me outside the entrance of the Lodge Hotel in Coleraine and hand me my filthy lucre. 

I found the whole business of liaising with the tabloid press akin to swimming with sharks. Once I passed on the information, I lost control of the situation and felt vulnerable. I grew up flirting with the idea of becoming a journalist, but I was learning that journalism was not really a noble profession. 

This should have been the end of my association with the NOTW, but it wasn't. 

Around that time, the Iris Robinson scandal broke. Peter Robinson's career was teetering on the brink. Nobody could land a decisive blow on the First Minister, so the tabloids were sniffing around for a knockout punch. Ciaran rang me up and asked if I knew anything about Robinson booking taxis 'on account' or if there was anyone at the taxi firm he could get information from. I couldn't help, even if I wanted to, but I suggested that he loiter around a bakery opposite Botanic railway station where some of the taxi staff went at lunchtime. 

It's weird but it's true: The News Of The World actually asked me to help them topple the First Minister of Northern Ireland! 

Although I came from a loyalist/unionist background, I would have sunk Peter Robinson if I could have. I had no strong feelings about him one way or another, but I was just like the assassin in Peter Gabriel's 'Family Snapshot', I was an opportunist, 'on the make', willing to exploit almost anyone or anything. For a few years afterwards, I probably had a mild form of depression. The way I was feeling, I would have sunk anyone.....and I mean anyone! 

I have moaned a few times in recent years that some people seem wary of me. I don't know what people know or think they know or what they've heard, but I suppose when you see this tale, I can hardly blame people for being wary of me! Mr W is not to be trifled with, boys and girls. I used to almost specialise in feuds. 

In recent times, I have been doing quite a lot of good (which is under the radar for many of you) and I am enjoying being 'nice' and getting good feedback from some quarters. It seems that this bogeyman is in danger of being popular again for the first time since I was in P7! I am keen to remain nice. It's nice to be nice. Long may it last! 

Bizarrely, myself, the BBC, and the News Of The World were briefly entwined again the following summer in Westminster, but that's a story for another day!

Share this post
Repost0
November 25 2020 3 25 /11 /November /2020 21:06

 MORE THAN SIXTY GREEDY PIGS

The following individuals are named in recent annual reports for various Northern Ireland Executive departments. Some people might say that those below are selfish, overpaid money grabbers, but I couldn't possibly comment.

The publication of their salary figures is done in a characteristically sneaky way by putting neither a pound sign nor the zeros next to each amount. Furthermore, a couple of departments have tried to camouflage the top earners' identity by initialising their first name. Are they ashamed to reveal the full name?

I regard these people as the enemy. As so much public funds are diverted into their bank accounts, it means that there are less financial resources allocated elsewhere in the public sector. Some folk might describe this as a disgusting scandal, but I couldn't possibly comment.

Anyhow, their inflated remuneration applies to the following years:
*2017-2018
**2018-2019
***2019-2020


THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE
David Sterling, £455,000-£460,000*
Brenda King, £200,000-£205,000*
Dr Mark Browne, £95,000-£100,000*
Katrina Godfrey, £100,000-£105,000*
Peter Toogood, £90,000-£95,000*
Colm Shannon, £195,000-£200,000*
Chris McNabb, £90,000-£95,000*
Graeme Wilkinson, £105,000-£110,000**


DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT, and RURAL AFFAIRS
Dr D McMahon, £165,000-£170,000**
B Doherty, £220,000-£225,000***
N Fulton, £145,000-£150,000***
R Huey, £125,000-£130,000***
F McCandless, £140,000-£145,000***
D Small, £135,000-£140,000***
D Reid, £90,000-£95,000**
S McGrade, £210,000-£215,000**


DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION
Derek Baker, £150,000-£155,000*
Fiona Hepper, £115,000-£120,000**
John Smith, £225,000-£230,000**
Noelle Buick, £130,000-£135,000**
Gary Fair, £90,000-£95,000**
Gavin Boyd, £145,000-£150,000**


DEPARTMENT for the ECONOMY
Mike Brennan, £220,000-£225,000***
Noel Lavery, £160,000-£165,000**
Heather Cousins, £125,000-£130,000***
Eugene Rooney, £110,000-£115,000**
Colin Lewis, £120,000-£125,000***
Richard Rodgers, £105,000-£110,000***
Diarmuid McLean, £100,000-£105,000***
Stephen McMurray, £100,000-£105,000***


DEPARTMENT of FINANCE
Joanne McBurney, £250,000-£255,000***
Sue Gray, £245,000-£250,000***
Hugh Widdis, £190,000-£195,000***
Bill Pauley, £175,000-£180,000**
Eugene O'Loan, £155,000-£160,000***
Paul Wickens, £145,000-£150,000**
Jill Minne, £140,000-£145,000**
Ian Snowden, £140,000-£145,000***
Claire Archbold, £135,000-£140,000**
Des Armstrong, £130,000-£135,000***
Stewart Barnes, £160,000-£165,000**
Siobhan Carey, £130,000-£135,000***


DEPARTMENT of HEALTH
R Pengelly, £195,000-£200,000**
S Holland, £130,000-£135,000**
C McArdle, £90,000-£95,000**
Dr Michael McBride, £200,000-£205,000**
D McNeilly, £145,000-£150,000**
J Johnston, £125,000-£130,000**
N Lloyd, £105,000-£110,000**
S Gallagher, £200,000-£205,000**
D West, £135,000-£140,000**


DEPARTMENT for COMMUNITIES
Jackie Kerr, £125,000-£130,000**
Louise Warde Hunter, £115,000-£120,000**
Deborah Brown, £90,000-£95,000**


DEPARTMENT for INFRASTRUCTURE
Katrina Godfrey, £175,000-£180,000**
Peter May, £130,000-£135,000*
John McGrath, £105,000-£110,000**
Dr Andrew Murray, £120,000-£125,000**
Fiona McCandless, £110,000-£115,000*
John Irvine, £195,000-£200,000**


DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE
Peter May, £155,000-£160,000***
Anthony Harbinson, £140,000-£145,000***
Ronnie Armour, £150,000-£155,000***
Deborah Brown, £95,000-£100,000***
David A Lavery, £110,000-£115,000**
Lianne Patterson, £120,000-£125,000**

Share this post
Repost0
October 18 2020 7 18 /10 /October /2020 20:20

Framed Certificate Copies Of The Ulster Covenant for sale, £8.

Simply email gw930@yahoo.com with the names of your ancestors and I will dispatch a certificate on request.

Also, framed certificate copies of the dead from the two world wars are also available, same price, same email address.

Share this post
Repost0
August 9 2013 5 09 /08 /August /2013 07:12

What constitutes a safe seat? Let me throw the following suggestion out there. First of all, it is not sufficient to state that a seat is safe if the elected Member of Parliament possesses more than half of the vote. At Bristol North East in 1970, Robert Adley accumulated more than fifty per cent of the votes cast, but his majority was a measly 462. This may be an extreme example, but it does illustrate that just because Candidate A has more votes than all the other candidates added together, this does not automatically render he or she the custodian of a safe seat.

 

I would argue that a seat is safe (indeed ultra-safe) if the MP’s majority is greater than the total votes polled by the other candidates. I am guessing that one will struggle to find too many occasions when this safe seat scenario has not been valid. One occasion when such a safe seat is indeed unsafe is at a by-election. Glasgow East in 2008 illustrates this exception.

 

Anyhow, now that the Boundary Commission’s most recent recommendations have regrettably been mothballed, I have taken the liberty of pouring over all the 650 constituency results from the most recent British general election charade in May 2010. Applying my criteria, I was surprised to find only 25 seats which fall into my safe seat category. I think that we can safely say that there are a great many more constituencies where the current incumbent can sleep safely in their bed in advance of their next beauty contest in 2015. Therefore, it might be more prudent to define my findings as ultra-safe seats, in other words, the kind of constituency contests which are basically non-contests, the political equivalent of a five furlong horse race involving a champion sprinter competing against three or four donkeys. The listed constituencies consequently can be described as Britain’s safest 25 seats, where to coin a phrase, the incumbent MP β€˜only has to turn up to win’. You won’t find too may high profile politicians and front-bench spokespersons campaigning in such constituencies, because their result will be deemed a foregone conclusion. Instead, those persons living within the confines of a key marginal will instead have the joy or pain of a multitude of heavyweight politicos tramping up and down their shopping precincts and beyond, ensuring that every possible vote can be squeezed out of such target seats at the next national poll.

 

Meanwhile, here are the 25 seats that appear to be β€˜safe as houses’, five of which are in the current possession of the Conservative Party while the Labour Party currently lays claim to seventeen such Westminster strongholds. In the list underneath, the MPs are Conservative, unless otherwise stated. Only thirteen are located in England’s green and pleasant land, while there are none in Wales. Northern Ireland boasts two such ultra-safe seats whilst north of the border, there are no fewer than ten mega-safe seats. The MPs of such fiefdoms will not thank me for publishing these findings as perversely there is nothing that galvanises people more than the thought that they and their vote are taken for granted. Could a surprise therefore be on the cards? I doubt this somehow!   

 

[compiled by Gary Watton; author of The Celtic Fringe (GW Publications, 2012) under the anagram pseudonym of 'Grant Toway'

 

Beaconsfield

Belfast West [Sinn Fein]

Birkenhead [Labour]

Bootle  [Labour]

Chelsea and Fulham

Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill [Labour]

Down North [Independent Unionist]

Dunbartonshire West [Labour]

Easington  [Labour]

East Ham [Labour]

Glasgow North East  [Labour]

Glasgow South West  [Labour]

Glenrothes  [Labour]

Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath  [Labour]

Knowsley  [Labour]

Maldon

Motherwell and Wishaw  [Labour]

Orkney and Shetland [Liberal Democrat]

Paisley and Renfrewshire South  [Labour]

Rayleigh and Wickford

Richmond (Yorkshire)

Rutherglen and Hamilton West  [Labour]

South Holland and The Deepings  [Labour]

Tottenham  [Labour]

West Ham  [Labour]

Share this post
Repost0
July 18 2013 4 18 /07 /July /2013 06:49

Modern Britain is a fascist democracy. A what? I hear you say. Seriously, folks. Our parents, grandparents, and assorted ancestors went to war in the early 1940s seemingly to defeat the disease of fascism, or more particularly Nazism. However, fascism is still alive and thriving today in Britain and the western world, many decades after the heroic sacrifices of our predecessors. Permit me to explain.

 

Well, first of all, let us briefly tackle the myth that Britain fought and conquered fascism in the early 1940s. The reality is that the Nazi brand of fascism drew its racist inspiration from an Englishman by the name of Chamberlain: Houston Stewart Chamberlain [who married into the Wagner family]. Nazism was based upon totally misguided racial theories. The Japanese harboured similar racialist tosh during their barbaric flexing of muscles for a decade up to the necessary dropping of the atom bombs. Fascism was not defeated in 1945. It is prevalent in Britain and the First World. It is no longer a racist ideology of gobbledygook, but instead has become a lot more subtle.

 

Instead, I would argue that fascism is derived primarily from the Nietzschean concept of the Supermen - individuals who by dint of their skills and talent are supposedly superior to other lesser mortals whom he termed Untermenschen. Well, speaking as a self-respecting Untermensch, I live in a society where celebrities, sporting superstars, business leaders, politicians, and the royal scroungers all earn amounts of money which far exceed the income and 'wealth' of the great unwashed. How can it be permissible if fat cat bankers and MPs are not willing to get out of bed for less than about sixty thousand pounds per annum whilst they exhort many millions of the populace to make do with the minimum wage? Why are some people much more handsomely rewarded than others? Is this merely a manifestation of a meritocracy where the high-flying achievers acquire much more wealth and rewards than the under-achievers? Why do the middle-class professionals get exorcised when their retirement funds or pensions are jeopardised and are strangely silent about the have-nots in our selfish society? Could it be that many folk feel that their university education has earned them the right to become a two or three-car family with a holiday home or regular holidays abroad whilst the uneducated should content themselves with much less? Is this not fascism: the belief that some people are more superior than others and deserve much more? This is fascism in its purest, impure concept.

 

I would venture to state that it is a case of meritocracy gone mad and is instead in keeping with Nietszchean fascism, the notion that certain people are more superior than others and that these Ubermensch deserve more wealth than the Untermensch. The government policy as practised by administration after administration, regardlesss of their apparent political label, is one of containment of the grievances of the underdogs and doing the bare minimum to redistribute income and wealth. No government has the moral courage to confront the great taboo of British politics and society which is to demand that the Head of State and her vast entourage pay their fair share and make a suitable contribution to the economy. It seems that our political leaders are terrified of questioning the royal scrooges in case they take umbrage and refuse to confer knighthoods and such awards. Clearly, patronage is very much part and parcel of the British Establishment. It simpy won't do to offend the monarch whilst the greed of the monarchy is itself offensive to any sensible observer.  Perhaps John Lydon, vocalising in 1977, was correct after all when he stated "God save the Queen, the fascist regime."

Share this post
Repost0
January 18 2013 5 18 /01 /January /2013 11:47

Gary Watton, the world's least-known celebrity, is a prolific author, commentator and historian of informative, non-fiction reference books. He was born in Fulford Maternity Hospital because there was no room at the inn. An accomplished air guitarist, he is the product of a mixed marriage: his father was a man, and his mother was a woman, so he had a difficult upbringing. Anyhow, at the time of writing he has penned nineteen titles, covering such topics as cricket, politics, popular music, rugby union, and soccer. He is the first writer to compile a chronology of all post-war Ashes test matches; one of the first writers to produce an item on the Five Nations/Six Nations rugby tournament; the first writer to issue a book on the British Home Internationals' soccer tournament; and the first writer to complete a book which has 'pilfered' literally thousands of comments off YouTube!
He was educated at Harpur's Hill County Primary School and then Coleraine Academical Institution, County Londonderry whereupon he left with 3 A Levels in 1988. He then graduated from the University of Bradford in 1992 with a BSc 2i in Social Sciences (History and Politics). The following year he graduated again from the same institution with an M.A. in European Studies (West European Politics). After experiencing a variety of employment he developed his passion for writing. He has written most of his books under different pseudonyms, and his list of publications includes:
Chelsea FC Day by Day by Gary Watton
Chelsea versus Arsenal, the first 150 matches by Gary Watton
That Was The Decade That Was by 'Arthur TS Jackson'
The Song For Today by 'Jimmie Oliver'
An Essential Guide To Music In The 1970s by 'Johnny Zero'
A Concise Guide To Eighties' Music by 'Karl Vorderman'
England Football Team, 1946-2006, A Complete Record by 'John Bull'
The Ashes, 1945-2005, A Complete Record by 'Tony Wagtar' [anagram of author's name]
The Five Nations/Six Nations, 1970-2009, A Complete Record by 'Ian Bronderson'
England's World Cup Adventures Since 1945, A Complete Record by 'Talented Loser'
A Pop Revolution, the transatlantic music scene 1965 to 1969 by 'the invisible man'
The Home Internationals' Soccer Tournament, 1946-1984, A Complete Record by 'the King of 'Trivia'
A Bizarre Collection Of Puzzles by 'The Enigma'
The Celtic Fringe by 'Grant Toway' [anagram of the author's name]
You Are A Tube! by 'Steven Fried PLC'
Gary was a member of a successful Harpur's Hill primary school soccer team that won its league (the Killowen Cup) in April 1981 even though seven or eight of the eleven players were still in P6, a feat thatΒ may never be matched by any other primary school anywhere! He was also an undefeated member of the school's badminton team which also won its league the same year.
A few years later in January 1984, Gary reached the last 32 round of the Ulster Under-19 Snooker Championships whilst only fourteen years of age.
Mr Watton is also a devotee of puzzles and quizzes, and he appeared on Channel Four's 'Fifteen To One' on December the 3rd 1997. In January 2006 he was narrowly defeated on a 'crucial conundrum' in a cliffhanger episode of 'Countdown'. His opponent, Michael Bowden, went on to win his subsequent seven matches.
Mr Watton, who made a handful of appearances in London as a stand-up comedian in 2004 and 2005, has skirted around the periphery of the media, and thus far has been interviewed by Marie Louise-Muir for an edition of Radio Ulster's Arts Extra in late July 2008 to promote 'The Song For Today', posing under the nom de plume of Jimmie Oliver. He was then interviewed at BBC Broadcasting House in July 2009 on the morning of the First Ashes Test where he was quizzed arising out of his then newly-published Ashes book. His interview appeared on the 'Up All Night' show for Radio Five Live. More recently, Mr Watton was a guest on 'Pienaar's Politics' on Radio Five Live in July 2011.
In April 2012 Gary Watton submitted a request to the UK's Ministry of Justice to have the Royal Pardon posthumously bestowed upon Anne Boleyn, Catherine Howard, and Lady Jane Grey. He also requested that the UK government belatedly issues a statement which nullifies the nonsense crime of heresy against the Catholic and Protestant martyrs of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Regardless of whether or not such appeals prove initially successful, Gary at least has made the first trailblazing moves to correct such miscarriages of justice. It may be that others will take on the baton to ensure eventual success.
In September 2012, Gary lobbied a number of MPs regarding the need to fine the next of kin who permit the funeral of their loved ones to be hijacked by a firing of shots over the coffin, as practised primarily by Irish republicans.
Mr Watton is also intending to lobby UK politicians about the need to legislate on the subject of job application forms and make them more user-friendly by limiting the size of any application form to an absolute maximum of ten pages.
Meanwhile, the UK Public Lending Right agency revealed that Gary Watton's books have been borrowed 2,077 times between July 1st 2009 and June 30th 2012 by libraries in the United Kingdom.
This author, who has been nominated as the most promising newcomer for the eighth year in succession by the Continuity Independent Runners' Association is a keen athlete. He is a leading participant at the weekly Portrush Parkrun, a 5,000 metres race which takes place on a beach. In January 2013, Gary was nominated as the first-ever male recipient of the monthly Portrush Parkrun prize. He is also a racist: he particularly likes such races as the Grand National, the Derby, and the men's Olympic 100 metres. As an amateur 'athlete', Gary Watton became the first competitor to complete ten Portrush 5k Parkruns in November 2012.
Finally, Gary is articulate and 'a bit opinionated', the latter arising out of his disdain for inequality and injustice. He is particularly offended by the accumulation of wealth, and as a practising Christian, he sees no connection whatsoever between luxury or wealth and the life and teachings of our Saviour, Jesus Christ.
You can stalk this lovely person at http://gw930.blog.comΒ Β OR at http://rongattway.blog.co.uk

Β 

MY OBITUARY

Family and several friends were shocked, though not entirely surprised, to learn of the sudden death of Gary Watton after a lengthy illness. This supremely talented author, genius, and misfit had fought a courageous battle against alienation and loneliness.

A handful of people jumped at the opportunity to take a day off work and pay their insincere, clichΓ©d respects at the funeral service which passed off without incident apart from when the deceased opened the coffin lid and grumpily exhorted the vicar to keep the noise down, before returning to sleep. At the graveside, a volley of shots was fired over the coffin by the Boys Brigade from their water pistols for their ex-volunteer. Also at the graveside, one relative was heard to remark: β€œI will miss his sarcasm”, while another mourner added: β€œI do not know how I will be able to cope without his cynicism.” Watton’s local pub landlord was visibly upset (at the thought that his takings would never be the same again) while a representative from the dead man’s mortgage lenders also expressed his regret at the unexpected death after a prolonged illness. It was however of some consolation to the assembled few that the deceased passed away noisily in his sleep.

The vicar (and presumably a part-time actor) spoke movingly of how the former author had been the very essence of warmth, pleasantness, and sheer joy, adding that no party had ever been complete without Mr Watton letting off steam about something or other. The local police Chief Inspector also paid tribute to how Gary had frequently helped the police with their enquiries. The mourners were assured that the deceased would be joining Adolf Hitler, Michael Jackson, Joe Stalin, Jade Goody, and Frank Lampard’s mum in heaven.

At the conclusion of the burial, some relatives retired to a nearby hostelry where they drank several toasts to the deceased and recalled with considerable mirth, Gary Watton’s many embarrassing exploits, a session which predictably lasted into the wee small hours, before bracing themselves for the reading of the will to ascertain who would be the unfortunate recipient of his clothes and record collection.

Perhaps the most fitting epitaph for Gary Watton was conceived by himself: a hugely under-rated actor, comedian, dancer, politician, singer, and writer, there was nothing wrong with him that a little love and understanding wouldn’t have cured.

In lieu of flowers, please give a donation to the International Ranters’ Society or to S.P.I.T.E (the Society for the Preservation of Incredibly Talented Enigmas).

Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β 
Β 
Oh I suppose the least that I can do is to show my face…..for what it’s worth.

Β 

Share this post
Repost0
January 17 2013 4 17 /01 /January /2013 11:11

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls,
Permit me to share the following information with you. I have previously worked for a Belfast taxi firm and as a consequence I had access to literally thousands of taxi bookings. This item refers to bookings that were made in the years immediately preceding August 2009, starting circa the beginning of 2007. Unless I am mistaken, the BBC in every urban centre in the UK in which it has premises and staff, constantly provide taxis for some employees and also for many guests in their studios. Such taxis are euphemistically described as β€œon account.” This means that such fares are not paid by the actual passenger, but are charged to the BBC. Ultimately, such taxi journeys are being funded by the Licence Fee-payer. On a scale of one to ten, just how acceptable do you think that it is that the hard-pressed Licence Fee-payer is subsidising a multitude of taxi journeys every day in urban centres throughout the Disunited Queendom? A fair fare? Surely not?
However, what lends a degree of farce, not to mention hypocrisy, to the proceedings is that during the very time period when the expenses of politicians were brought into sharp focus by the media, including the BBC, we discover that BBC personnel and their high-profile guests [many of whom are/were wealthy celebrities] were creaming free taxi journeys off the public purse!
It gets worse, or funnier, depending upon your sense of humour. When I liaised with the nice boys and girls at the News Of The World about such shenanigans in August 2009, the BBC in Belfast summoned two β€˜investigators’ on the BBC payroll to fly over from the north of England to threaten me with possible charges of harrassment against BBC staff. Frankly speaking, my activities were not quite in the top drawer of espionage or subversive sabotage, which the two gents [former gendarmes] readily conceded. Therefore, no charges were forthcoming in the event, though the NOTW still published details from my findings. What this episode demonstrates is that the BBC and other media vehicles would not flinch at exposing the bonus and expenses culture of others, but God have mercy on anyone who dared to reveal that this same broadcasting giant also has its hands filthy with the same rotten endeavours.
Ask yourselves the following questions:
1. Why should BBC staff be permitted [on occasions] to travel to and from work in an all-expenses paid taxi when the rest of the populace have to pay for their journeys to and from work?
2. Why should guests of the BBC who may have been invited for interviews [frequently wealthy guests into the 'bargain'] be permitted free taxis paid out of the public purse when the rest of us suckers have to pay for travel to job interviews or medical appointments?
3. Gordon Brown and David Cameron ordered their Members of Parliament to repay their extravagant expenses. What do you reckon is the likelihood that the BBC and its personnel will have the integrity to re-pay the vast mountain of free taxis that they have accrued, funded by the Licence Fee-payers?
Okay, without further ado, feel free to browse through the enclosed hall of shame of current and former BBC employees who booked taxis β€œon account” in Northern Ireland [predominantly but not exclusively in the Greater Belfast area]. As a disclaimer [your Honour], it is only fair to point out that some of the listed people who have taken Joe Public for a ride may have only taken one taxi journey. Therefore, there is much variation in the volume of taxis ordered β€œon account” by the individuals below. Secondly, as the listed information only covers a period of two and a half years in but one locality in the UK, the mind boggles at the sheer numbers of staff and guests who have taken the Licence Fee-payer for a ride over the last decade and beyond. We are talking about the tip of a gargantuan iceberg here. Personally, I regard it as obscenely scandalous, but hey, you are welcome to your own thoughts.
Oh and penultimately, I have not fabricated any of the information. I am not in the business of constructing fantasy statistics. I also do not have a grudge against the BBC. I merely have a grudge against the agents of hypocrisy. After all, the bonus and perks culture extends way beyond Auntie Beeb or Westminster village. Many banks such as the Ulster Bank, the Bank of Ireland, and First Trust have in the past paid for staff taxis out of bank funds, which were the product of their members’ investments. [That, one might say, is a story for another day]. Mind you, maybe Michael Corleone was correct in β€˜The Godfather Part II’ when he stated to the senator that β€œwe are all part of the same hypocrisy.”
Oh and finally, if you delude yourself that this blog piece is a total work of fiction, then take yourself off to the nearest BBC studio or building and ask the passengers who alight from each taxi if they have paid for the fare. Better still, ask the cab driver if he received a cash payment or whether his company is charging the BBC [i.e. the Licence Fee-payer] for the travel costs. Some of the passengers are elected politicians. Do you think that they are suddenly paying their way, like the rest of us? Do you truly think that β€œwe are all in it together?” Oh don’t let me arouse you from your complacent slumber!
At this stage, may I remind you that you are investing Β£145.50 per year in a TV Licence. Enjoy the view:

*****BBC TAXIS BOOKED FROM FONACAB***** [these figures include a number of BBC accounts, including BBC sport]
2007 – 9,646
JANUARY – 690
FEBRUARY – 754
MARCH – 919
APRIL – 699
MAY – 869
JUNE – 803
JULY – 575
AUGUST – 709
SEPTEMBER – 757
OCTOBER – 983
NOVEMBER – 1,091
DECEMBER – 797
2008 – 8,465
JANUARY – 778
FEBRUARY – 782
MARCH – 663
APRIL – 744
MAY – 732
JUNE – 618
JULY – 581
AUGUST – 516
SEPTEMBER – 763
OCTOBER – 845
NOVEMBER – 819
DECEMBER – 624
2009
JANUARY/FEBRUARY – 1,480
MARCH – 890
1 – 6
2 – 26
3 – 39
4 – 34
5 – 37
6 – 32
7 – 18
8 – 28
9 – 37
10 – 34
11 – 34
12 – 39
13 – 41
14 – 16
15 – 10
16 – 33
17 – 35
18 – 31
19 – 27
20 – 28
21 – 12
22 – 7
23 – 38
24 – 45
25 – 36
26 – 47
27 – 25
28 – 23
29 -17
30 – 29
31 – 26
APRIL – 698
1 – 62
2 – 44
3 – 30
4 – 11
5 – 7
6 – 19
7 – 26
8 – 26
9 – 25
10 – 11
11 – 7
12 – 4
13 – 4
14 – 15
15 – 26
16 – 27
17 – 23
18 – 7
19 – 6
20 – 31
21 – 34
22 – 23
23 – 40
24 – 30
25 – 11
26 – 7
27 – 39
28 – 41
29 – 28
30 – 44
MAY – 824
1 – 26
2 – 10
3 – 6
4 – 11
5 – 33
6 – 57
7 – 59
8 – 43
9 – 22
10 – 5
11 – 30
12 – 35
13 – 53
14 – 34
15 – 44
16 – 10
17 – 9
18 – 35
19 – 39
20 – 34
21 – 46
22 – 30
23 – 9
24 – 3
25 – 13
26 – 23
27 – 39
28 – 29
29 – 20
30 – 10
31 – 7
JUNE -
1 – 29
2 – 22
3 – 30
4 – 25
5 – 28
6 – 12
7 – 10
8 – 34
9 – 35
10 – 29
11 – 31
12 – 30
13 – 8
14 – 10
15 – 30
MARK.ADAIR
RYAN.ADAMS
WILLIAM.ADAMS
BRENDAN.ANDERSON
WENDY.AUSTIN
ELAINE.AYRE
CLARE.BALDING
MICHAEL.BEDWELL
NEIL.S.BELL
LOUISE.BIRT
PHILIP.BLAIR
NIALL.BLANEY
FIONUALA.BOYD
SEAMUS.BOYD
HELEN.BROWN
JAMES.BUCHANAN
CLAIRE.BURGOYNE
OLLIE.BURTON
JOHN.CAMPBELL
EMMA.CANAVAN
UNA.CARLIN
ROSS.CARSON
GLENN.CARTMILL
GARY.CARVILL
MARK.CHESTNUTT
PETE.CLIFTON
MELISSA.COCKRILL
BRYAN.COLL
PETER.COOPER
GEORGIE.CORBETT
NIAMH.COSTIGAN
PATRICIA.COYLE
STEPHEN.CRAIG
WILLIAM.CRAWLEY
GEMMA.CUNNINGHAM
TONY.CURRIE
TONY.CURRY
CECILIA.DALY
SUZANNE.DALY
WARREN.DALZELL
PATRICIA.DAVEY
STEPHEN.DOUDS
LAURIAN.DUFF
ITA.DUNGAN
JENNIFER.DUPREE
RICHARD.EVANS
RICHARD.EVANS.01
BOLA.FATIMILEHIN
LYNETTE.FAY
SHARON.FERGUSON
COLIN.FITTON
JIM.FITZPATRICK
JULIE.FLANAGAN
BOBBY.FRIEDMAN
ANGELINA.FUSCO
NIALL.GALLAGHER
CONOR.GARRETT
CERI.GODDARD
LUCY.GOLLOGLY
LIZ.GREGG
CHIARA.JANE.GRINDLE
TIFFANY.HALL
RYAN.HAND
LISA.HANRATTY
SUZANNE.HARRISON
MICHAEL.HART
JAMES.HAYES
MICHAEL.HIGGINS
PHILIP.HILDITCH
STEVEN.HOBSON
RAY.HUNT
SIMON.HUNTER
GARETH.HYDES
MARIE.IRVINE
MARK.JEFFERS
ROTHA.JOHNSTON
KELVIN.JONES
ANNE.JORDAN
FERGAL.KEANE
MORAG.KEATING
CHRIS.KELLY
JEANNINE.KELLY
IAN.JACK-GW
MELANIE.LAW
EVA.LENNOX
LOUISE.LIDDY
CHRIS.LINDSAY
ALEXANDER.LITTLEWOOD
JOSEPHINE.LONG
SUSAN.LOVELL
ANN.LYNAS
DARRAGH.MACINTYRE
ELAINE.MAGUIRE
CERI.MALLON
KATHRYN.MARTIN2
KATHY.MARTIN
DAVID.MAXWELL
NATALIE.MAYNES
JOHN.MCALISKEY
JOHN.MCCABE
NAOMI.MCCAFFERTY
BARBARA.MCCANN
JACKIE.MCCANN
HARRY.MCLEAN
MARK.MCCLEARY
BRYAN.MCCOLLUM
RORY.MCCONNELL
SHAUNA.MCCONVILLE
SEAMUS.MCCRACKEN
JULIE.MCCULLOUGH
LAURA.MCDAID
FIONA.MCGAUGHEY
CIARA.MCGRILLAN
PAUL.MCGUIGAN
LEO.MCGURNAGHAN
MARGARET.MCKEE
GREG.MCKEVITT
PAUL.MCKILLION
GABRIEL.MCPARLAND
KATHARINE.MCQUADE
MAURICE.MEHAFFEY
PETER.MELLY
ROBBIE.MEREDITH
ANITA.MIAH
MERVYN.MIDDLEBY
PHILIP.MILLER
CAMERON.MITCHELL
JANICE.MONDJACK
CATHY.MOOREHEAD
CATHARINE.MORRISON
JOHNNY.MUIR
MARIE-LOUISE.MUIR
ALASTAIR.NEELY
ADAM.NIXON
MARTIN.OBRIEN
CARA.ODOHERTY
ANTAINE.ODONNAILE
CAROLE.OKANE
JOHN.OKANE
JO.O’LEARY
FIONA.O’NEILL
JOHN.ONEILL
BARRY.ORMAN
AILSA.ORR
JULIA.PAUL
CAROLINE.PEDDLE
ANGIE.PHILLIPS
SIMON.PILBEAM
MICHAEL.PRICE
STUART.PRITCHARD
NIGEL.REES
MELVIN.RICKARBY
CIARA.RIDDELL
ELHAM.RIZI
ZOE.ROBINSON
GERRY.ROGERS
DAVID.ROWNEY
LINDA.RUDDY
RUTH.SANDERSON
NATASHA.SAYEE
EMMA.SCHOLES
MICHAEL.SELBY
YVETTE.SHAPIRO
MARK.SIDEBOTTOM
MICHAEL.SIMON
IAN.SINCLAIR
RUTH.SLOAN
COLLETTA.SMITH
CONOR.SPACKMAN
SARAH.STACK
GRAEME.STEWART
JO.STREET
ELAINE.SUTHERLAND
MARK.TAYLOR.01
HELEN.THOMPSON
KERRY.THOMPSON
HELEN.TOLAND
MARIA.TUMELTY
CATHY.WALKER
MARK.WALKER
ANNEMARIE.WALLACE
ANDREW.WASSALL
STEPHEN.WATSON
IAN.WILLIAMSON
JENNY.WILSON
FIONA.WOODS
KIERAN.YEATES

Share this post
Repost0
January 16 2013 3 16 /01 /January /2013 13:09

No this isn’t a homage to a Roxy Music album from the 1970s, but instead this page is my own vision for the Disunited Queendom. Tony Bennett once sang β€˜If I Ruled The World’. Well here is my programme for government if I ruled Little Britain. [The following prescriptions for ailing Britain, our sick society, are in no order of importance.]

 

There should be a referendum on whether or not Britain wishes to remain in the European Union.

 

There should be a referendum in the Falkland Islands on the issue of its sovereignty. Even if the islanders agree to preserve the status quo, there should be a conciliatory gesture of permitting a rolling increase of Argentine involvement in the administration of what they refer to as the Malvinas.

 

There should be a referendum in Northern Ireland to determine its constitutional position for the next ten years.

 

The BBC licence fee should be scrapped. The time is long overdue that the BBC should stand on its own two feet and not rely on a mandatory licence fee imposed on its viewers. No other broadcasting network demands such terms and conditions of its customers. The BBC must operate in the marketplace in much the same way as its competitors, relying either on subscriptions, as Sky does, or upon revenue from advertising, as experienced by the likes of ITV. Given the scandals and its flawed history, not to mention the unmerited high salaries of its chief executives and overpaid presenters, the BBC should not command a compulsory licence fee from its hard-pressed viewers.

 

The next of kin should be fined one thousand pounds if they permit the firing of a volley of shots at the graveside ceremony of their loved one’s funeral.

 

It should be illegal to fly a paramilitary flag from one’s own house. The occupant should be fined one thousand pounds.

 

It should be illegal to burn any national flag, as periodically and provocatively practised in Northern Ireland.

 

The number of MLAs in Northern Ireland needs to be cut from a scandalous six members per constituency to five, even four members per constituency, thus sparing the public purse an obscenely high outlay of funds.

 

The number of MPs at Westminster needs surgery too. A more realistic total of five hundred ought to be aimed at. However, no Member of Parliament should have to represent any more than a maximum of one hundred thousand constituents. Where a constituency exceeds a total electorate of one hundred thousand, then boundary changes are needed to keep every constituency to a maximum of one hundred thousand people. No constituency should have an electorate of less than fifty thousand constituents.

 

There should be an absolute bare minimum tariff of twenty years for all life sentences. To be convicted of murder and then issued with a minimum of seventeen years clearly values the life of the deceased victim at approximately seventeen years, which is preposterous and insulting.

 

The National Minimum Wage should be increased from barely beyond six pounds per hour to a more respectful eight pounds per hour.

 

Businesses will be able to cope with the burden of these increased wages by means of a reduction in Corporation Tax.

In order to offset the national debt, Jobseekers Allowance should be cut from Β£71 per week to fifty-nine pounds per week. By increasing the margin between one week on Jobseekers Allowance and one week on the National Minimum Wage, the whole concept of work will never seem so attractive and there will be a huge stimulus to find employment. As someone who is currently receiving JSA, I am well-placed to comment on the anomaly of working full-time in a low-paid job when benefits are considerably more rewarding. There are enough benefits claimants shelling out their apparent wealth each day at the bookies or at the pub to suggest that there is something sickeningly amiss with Britain’s benefits culture. Unfortunately, for every genuine hard luck story, there appears to be many others who are benefiting a little too well from the benefits bestowed by the misguided liberals of Britain’s nanny state.

 

Job application forms should be legally restricted to a maximum of ten pages. Anything beyond this total is not user-friendly and is inclined to be padded out with unnecessary and downright intrusive questions.

 

All employers should be legally compelled to email all applicants for a vacancy and inform them of the outcome. It doesn’t take an eternity to contact people via email in contrast to the costly snail mail. Failing to inform all applicants about the outcome of their application is hugely disrespectful and demoralising.

 

In much the same way as there is a national criminal database, people should be able to volunteer information about their qualifications and employment record to a national database. Employers can then consult this database in order to ascertain a candidate’s suitability for an advertised vacancy. Such information would enable a candidate to curtail a lengthy application form by stating that such information is in the public domain and is verifiable.

 

The β€˜basic’ salary of Members of Parliament should be reduced from 63k to 60k per annum. This would provide an annual saving of two million pounds for the public purse. Admittedly, this is a mere drop in the ocean, but to quote the Tesco commercial, β€˜every little helps’. 

 

There needs to be an end to the golden handshakes culture that afflicts British society. The sacked, soometimes disgraced, sometimes underachieving chief executives and bosses of major organisations or corporations should not be rewarded for their failure. Employment law must be amended to outlaw employment contracts which facilitate huge pay-offs for departing employees. It would be good if the British parliament took a lead in this abominable situation and voted to stop the issuing of a large pension to MPs who lose their seats. Again, this is an example of rewarding failure, and it sets a terrible example.

 

Young persons under the age of eighteen should be legally prohibited from attending public protests. Anyone who breaches this law should be detained at a holding centre until a parent or guardian arrives and pays a spot fine of ten pounds before the underaged protester is released. If there is a repeat offence, the spot fine increases to Β£100. If there is a third violation, then a fine of Β£1,000 is issued.

 

All future motoring offences, such as speeding should result in a Β£100 fine for the perpetrator and a Β£1,000 for a repeat offence. Such measures would replace the outdated points system. For the first offence, the perpetrator would still have the choice between a fine or compulsory attendance at the drive safety course.

 

Whenever the police are asked to investigate a complaint of excessive noise at someone’s house, arising out of a late night, or early hours party, a spot fine of ten pounds should be issued to the property owner if the police record and/or film the noisy proceedings. Again, a repeat offence should incur a fine of Β£100, and a third offence should necessitate a Β£1,000 fine. Unfortunately, nowhere near enough is done to tackle such anti-social behaviour, and again the authorities seem impotent at protecting a person’s right to a quiet, peaceful existence, free from excessive noise in the night or early morning.

 

Young persons under the age of twenty who the police consider to be drunk and disorderly when attending or emerging from a night club or pub should be detained overnight in a holding centre where they can sober up, whilst in this temporary protective custody. The individual would then be released when a parent, partner, or guardian arrives at the holding centre and pays a spot fine of Β£10 for a first offence, Β£100 for a repeat offence, and Β£1,000 for a third such offence.

 

The revenue raised from the imposition of fines for the above offences can be allocated as follows:
1) The building and maintenance and staffing of new detention centres for those guilty of anti-social behaviour such as underage protesters and drunk and disorderly teenagers. Such centres would provide a brief, temporary stint of incarceration whilst arrangements were made for a parent, or guardian, or partner to arrive at the holding centre and settle the appropriate spot fine. Failure to pay the spot fine would automatically result in court proceedings being issued, after which an increased fine or custodial sentence would be bestowed upon any guilty party.
2) Funds from the fines would also be distributed to a central fund that would compensate anyone found innocent after having been remanded in custody. Any such individual who is acquitted after having been placed on remand would be compensated to the tune of Β£100 per week of their incarceration.

 

A maximum wage needs to be legally enforced to prevent Premiership soccer players grabbing outrageous weekly amounts which far exceed what many people earn over several years.

 

Football clubs should not be permitted to spend money in the transfer market, unless they have paid off their debts. There is something incongruous about a football club which owes money but which simultaneously is purchasing new players.

Share this post
Repost0